Commento su II Re 5:20
וַיֹּ֣אמֶר גֵּיחֲזִ֗י נַעַר֮ אֱלִישָׁ֣ע אִישׁ־הָאֱלֹהִים֒ הִנֵּ֣ה ׀ חָשַׂ֣ךְ אֲדֹנִ֗י אֶֽת־נַעֲמָ֤ן הָֽאֲרַמִּי֙ הַזֶּ֔ה מִקַּ֥חַת מִיָּד֖וֹ אֵ֣ת אֲשֶׁר־הֵבִ֑יא חַי־יְהוָה֙ כִּֽי־אִם־רַ֣צְתִּי אַחֲרָ֔יו וְלָקַחְתִּ֥י מֵאִתּ֖וֹ מְאֽוּמָה׃
Ma Gehazi, il servo di Eliseo, l'uomo di Dio, disse: 'Ecco, il mio padrone ha risparmiato questo Naaman l'Arameo, non ricevendo per mano ciò che aveva portato; man mano che l'Eterno vivrà, lo seguirò sicuramente e ne prenderò un po '.'
From David to Destruction
What Goes Wrong?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Rashi on II Kings
Something. The ‘א’ is missing,14The word “מְאוּמָה” is written “מוּמָה,” without the ‘א.’ מוּם means a flaw. As a result of this taking, he was stricken with Na’amon’s flaw, that of tzora’as. because this taking was [responsible for his being stricken with] a flaw [=[מום.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy